In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Supplicationis Auseinandersetzung um Übertragung eines Pachtvertrages
Abt. IV. Rep. 1. B Prozeßakten des Tribunals 1653-1803
Prozeßakten des Tribunals 1653-1803 >> 11. 1. Kläger K
08.07.1762-02.08.1762
Kläger: (2) Pächter Hans Christian Kipp zu Zarnekow
Beklagter: Johann Christoph Kütemeier, Registrator am Tribunal, Jacob Johann Arends, Subrektor zu Wismar sowie Johann Hermann Adam Müller, Pastor zu Malchin als Vormünder der Waise Catharina Ilsabe Johanna Freude
Anwälte, Prokuratoren: Kl.: Dr. Theodor Johann Quistorp (A & P)
Fallbeschreibung: Kipp hatte das Gut Zarnekow seit 1760 gepachtet, ist mittlerweile aber zu alt für die schwere Arbeit geworden und präsentiert den früheren Pächter von Lischow, Johann Caspar Joachim Klitzing, als seinen Nachfolger und bittet um die Bestätigung des Tribunals zu dieser Änderung. Das Gericht fordert am selben Tag die Vormünder zur Stellungnahme auf, die am 19.07. eingeht. Am 22.07. fordert das Tribunal von Vormündern, Sicherheiten für ihr Mündel auszuhandeln und den neuen Vertrag vorzulegen. Am 24.07. legen Vormünder einen Sublocations-Vertrag für Klitzing vor und erbitten Bestätigung, die am 02.08.1762 durch das Gericht erfolgt.
Instanzenzug: 1. Tribunal 1762
Prozessbeilagen: (7) positive Stellungnahme Hieronymus Weichlers vom 08.07.1762; Erklärungen Kipps und Klitzings zur Übertragung des Pachtvertrags vom 22.07.1762
Akten
Information on confiscated assets
Additional information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person or organization that was persecuted under National Socialism. They could file a claim for compensation or restitution as part of the Wiedergutmachung policy. If the application was submitted by another person or organization than the persecutee (for example, their son or daughter), this other person or organization is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecutee is noted, if known. In the sources, the persecutee is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person or organization not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
