In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Jülich-Berg I (AA 0030) >> 5. Auswärtige Beziehungen >> 5.2. Andere Reichsstände >> 5.2.27. HEINSBERG >> 5.2.27.2. Linie BLANKENHEIM
1424-1438
Enthaeltvermerke: Darin: Streit mit dem Erzbischof von TRIER (Fischerei zu Hillesheim); desgl. mit Richard HURT, 1424; Albert ZOBBE, Propst zu KERPEN, nach 1427 August 15 (nach Piccard Wasserzeichen (2 kleine gekreuzte Schlüssel) identisch mit StA Düsseldorf, Jülich-Berg I 1059, Konzept Herzog Adolfs von JÜLICH, 1435 Februar 2 – Term. a quo 1434, wahrscheinlich beschrieben 1434/36); Vereinbarung eines Tages zwischen Erzbischof von TRIER und Graf von BLANKENHEIM, nach September 14 (nach Piccard Wasserzeichen (2 große gekreuzte Schlüssel) identisch mit StA Düsseldorf, Jülich-Berg I 301, Herzog Adolf von JÜLICH, 1423 November 28, und StadtA Frankfurt/M., RS I 1823/35b, Erzbischof Otto von TRIER, 1423, und ebda. 1977, Stadt Frankfurt, Konzept, 1424, und StadtA Göttingen, Kämmereiregister Göttingen 1423/24 – Term. a quo 1423, wahrscheinlich beschrieben 1423; vgl. 2. Beispiel); BULVER an Herzog (Adolf ?), nach 1423 (nach Piccard Wasserzeichen (Hand mit Schlüssel) identisch mit StA Düsseldorf, Jülich-Berg I 434, Lüdenscheid, 1436 Dezember 7 – Term. a quo 1435, wahrscheinlich beschrieben 1435/38); Siegel, 1430; Sache mit Wilhelm, Herrn zu WEVELINGHOVEN und Simon von BIRGEL, 1431; Anspruch des Gerhard von KLEVE auf den Heinsbergischen Anteil an JÜLICH, 1434; Streit mit dem Herzog, 1437/38
Diverse Registraturbildner
Sachakte
Information on confiscated assets
Further information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.