Kläger: Martin Lu(h)emann in Wentorf bei Bergedorf (Beklagter).- Beklagter: Joachim Vischer, Bauernvogt im Amt Bergedorf (Kläger).- Streitgegenstand: Appellationis, nunc (1574 et 1585) ciationis ad reassumendum; Zuschreibung eines Hofes an den auswärtigen Kläger und Beanspruchung des "ius protimiseos" (Näherrecht) durch den Beklagten in einem Streit um den Hof des Röbeke Hoyen (Högen) in Curslack, der von Hein Vischer, Carsten Vischer, Hein Hoyen und Claus Hoyen, Gläubiger und Bürgen des Röbbeke Hoyen, für 100 Mark lübisch an den Kläger verkauft worden war
Show full title
Kläger: Martin Lu(h)emann in Wentorf bei Bergedorf (Beklagter).- Beklagter: Joachim Vischer, Bauernvogt im Amt Bergedorf (Kläger).- Streitgegenstand: Appellationis, nunc (1574 et 1585) ciationis ad reassumendum; Zuschreibung eines Hofes an den auswärtigen Kläger und Beanspruchung des "ius protimiseos" (Näherrecht) durch den Beklagten in einem Streit um den Hof des Röbeke Hoyen (Högen) in Curslack, der von Hein Vischer, Carsten Vischer, Hein Hoyen und Claus Hoyen, Gläubiger und Bürgen des Röbbeke Hoyen, für 100 Mark lübisch an den Kläger verkauft worden war
211-2_L 54
L 3120
211-2 Reichskammergericht
Reichskammergericht >> L
1560-1585
Enthält: Prokuratoren: Kläger: Dr. David Capito (1560), Dr. Johann Bontz (1574). Beklagter: Lt. Martin Reichardt (1560), Dr. Alexander Reiffstock (1574), Dr. Johann Gödelmann (1577).- Instanzen: 1. (Landgericht Altengamme und Curslack 1555-1556). 2. (Landgericht Neuengamme und Kirchwerder 1557). 3. Räte der Städte Hamburg und Lübeck 1560. 4. Reichskammergericht 1560-1585.- Darin: Kommissionsbericht von 1581 des Domkapitels zu Bardowick über die Befragung zahlreicher Zeugen in Curslack, Altengamme und Neuengamme.
Archivale
Verwandte Bestände / Verzeichnungseinheiten: 741-4_S11247 (Bestelleinheit) [Mikroverfilmung von]
Information on confiscated assets
Additional information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person or organization that was persecuted under National Socialism. They could file a claim for compensation or restitution as part of the Wiedergutmachung policy. If the application was submitted by another person or organization than the persecutee (for example, their son or daughter), this other person or organization is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecutee is noted, if known. In the sources, the persecutee is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person or organization not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
07.03.2025, 11:57 AM CET