In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Enthält: Salentin von Veyder für seine Frau als Erbin der Catharina von Maes klagt gegen Heinrich Juen, Wirt in Mödrath. Heinrich habe die von den Vorfahren seiner Frau für 8 Heller jährlich gepachteten 8 Morgen Benden nicht von Hecken und Sträuchern befreit, wie es im Pachtvertrag vereinbart war, und sei darüber hinaus für mehrere Jahre Pacht schuldig geblieben. Schultheiß Weyerstraß setzt dem Beklagten eine Frist von 8 Tagen, die Forderungen zu erfüllen. Im Dezember fordert er das Gericht auf, Juen durch Exekutionsmittel zur Pachtnachzahlung zu veranlassen, aber ihm weitere Pachtung zu untersagen. Der Beklagte hatte seine Weigerung nämlich damit begründet, dass ihm vom offizialischen Gericht eine Pachtbefreiung kraft mandatum manutinentiae (= Schutzbrief) zugestanden worden war. Diese, so Veyder, hätte aber das Kerpener Gericht aufgehoben. Er gibt aber die Pachtbenden jetzt frei, sie einem anderen, der darauf Anspruch erheben würde, zuzuerkennen, den er dann auch bei eventuellen Unstimmigkeiten, schadlos halten wolle.
Schriftstücke: 2
Archivale
Juen, Heinrich, Wirt in Mödrath
Maes, Catharina von
Veyder, Salentin von
Weyerstraß, Schultheiß
Pachtforderung
Information on confiscated assets
Further information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
