Urteilsbegründungen der Assessoren am Tribunal
Show full title
0144
LAG, Rep. 29 Wismarer Tribunal
Wismarer Tribunal >> 02. Relationen
01.10.1781-31.12.1781
Christian von Gagern contra Advocat Droysen. - Altermann Dommes contra die Academie zu Greifswald. - Die Erben des General Baron von Wachtmeister contra den Altermann Brandenburg. - Der Regierungspedelle Melms in Stralsund contra den Gemeinen Anwalt der Horn Ludwigsburger Creditoren. - Bürgermeister und Rat der Stadt Stralsund contra Landrat von Mevius. - Der Reifer und Salzhändler Fischer zu Barth contra den Schiffer Claus Parow und dessen Mitreeder zu Zingst. - Der Doctor Gesterding contra den Advocat Fabricius. - Der von Creti auf Steinfeldt contrader von Krassow auf Schwelckvitz. - Der Procurator Civitatis Wend zu Greifswald contra seine Ehefrau. - Rector und Concil der Academie zu Greifswald contra Bürgermeister und Rat der Stadt Greifswald. - Die gesamten Geschwister von Barnekow contra den Gemeinen Anwalt der Scheelen Silvitzer Creditoren. - Der Kammerherr von Platen contra den Landrat von Usedom. - Bürgermeister Carl Wilhelm Stieveleben contra Doctor Hertzberg. - Advocat Cord contra Procurator Civitatis zu Greifswald. - Die Erben des Obristlieutnant von Wackenitz auf Boltenhagen contra den königlich preussischen Legitationsrat. - Pastor Loehr contra den gemeinen Anwalt des Rosenowschen Concurs. - Der Kammerherr von Langen contra den von Wakenitz. - Rektor und Concil der Academie zu Greifswald contra Bürgermeister und Rat der Stadt Greifswald. - Advocat Helwig zu Stralsund contra den Ratsverwandten Lüders. - Carolina Regina Hahn contra Ihren Ehemann Jonas Carlson Hahn. - Der Hauptmann von Colmar contra den Gemeinen Anwalt des Bandelin Rentzer Concurs. - Der ehemalige Hofgerichts Assessor Lange contra den Gemeinen Anwalt der Bünsow Müggenhallscher Creditoren. - Die Hofräthin der Bünsower Erben contra den Gemeinen Anwalt des Bünsow Müggenhallschen Concurs. - Die Hofräthin der Bünsower Erben contra Bürgermeister Stievelleben in Stralsund
Akten
Information on confiscated assets
Additional information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person or organization that was persecuted under National Socialism. They could file a claim for compensation or restitution as part of the Wiedergutmachung policy. If the application was submitted by another person or organization than the persecutee (for example, their son or daughter), this other person or organization is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecutee is noted, if known. In the sources, the persecutee is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person or organization not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
29.10.2025, 11:27 AM CET