In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
S. o. RKG 1736 (F 317/1158). Als nicht an das RKG erwachsen wurde die Sache 1604 an die Richter der vorigen Instanz remittiert.
Reichskammergericht, Teil III: E-G >> 2. Buchstabe F
1602-1604 (1579- 1604)
Enthaeltvermerke: Kläger: Vormünder der Kinder des Adolph von Frentz zu Kendenich (Erzstift Köln, Amt Brühl; Kr. Köln): Weinand von Frentz zu Schlenderhan (Schlenderhahn, Schlenderhall), (Bekl.) Beklagter: Margaretha Maaß, Witwe des Kölner Ratsmitglieds Dietrich Pfluger, (Kl.) Prokuratoren (Kl.): Dr. Sigismund Haffner 1602 Prokuratoren (Bekl.): Dr. Heinrich Stemler [1597] 1602 Prozeßart: Appellationis Instanzen: 1. Kurfürstl. köln. Kommission 1594 - 2. RKG 1602-1604 (1579- 1604) Beweismittel: Erbrentbrief über 90 Malter Korn, ausgestellt von Rutger von der Horst, kurfürstl. köln. Marschall und Statthalter des Vestes Recklinghausen, als Vormund des Adolph von Frentz zu Kendenich, 1579 (Q 5 und in den Vorakten Q 7, 32-46). Bestellung des Weinand von Frentz zum Vormund durch Crato Crafft, Vogt des Amts Bergheim, 1595 (Q 13). Beschreibung: 6,5 cm, 310 Bl., lose; Q 1-13, Q 10* und 11 fehlen, 11 Beilagen. Vgl. RKG 1736 (F 317/1158).
Sachakte
Information on confiscated assets
Additional information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person or organization that was persecuted under National Socialism. They could file a claim for compensation or restitution as part of the Wiedergutmachung policy. If the application was submitted by another person or organization than the persecutee (for example, their son or daughter), this other person or organization is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecutee is noted, if known. In the sources, the persecutee is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person or organization not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
