In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Klage (vor dem Stadtrichter) der Margarete von der Tinnen, Witwe Hinrich Stevening thom Broike und ihres Sohnes Evert Stevening ./. Johan Schultman zu Mecklenbeck und dessen Bürgen Albert Jockwech in Münster wg. eines Kindsteils.
Klage (vor dem Stadtrichter) der Margarete von der Tinnen, Witwe Hinrich Stevening thom Broike und ihres Sohnes Evert Stevening ./. Johan Schultman zu Mecklenbeck und dessen Bürgen Albert Jockwech in Münster wg. eines Kindsteils.
Enthält: Der Mann der Klägerin hat mit dem + Domkelner Dietrich von der Recke Eigenhörige ausgewechselt. Er gab ihm dem Johann tor Helle vom Erbe Wermelinck in Altenroxel und erhielt von ihm den Dietrich Schultman, den Sohn des Beklagten. Dieser hat seiner Dienstpflicht bei Stevening genügt, indem er 1/2 Jahr bei ihm Knecht (Baumeister) war, wie es Landesbrauch ist; er ist dann in vollem Eigentum gestorben. Die Klägerin verlangt deshalb sein Kindsteil, welches er an dem Erbe Schultman zu beanspruchen hatte, und beruft sich hierfür auf Gewohnheitsrecht. Sie hat den Beklagten in Münster bekümmern (anhalten) lassen, der Beklagte ist nach Stellung des Bürgen freigelassen. Der Beklagte wendet ein, sein Sohn habe nichts zu fordern gehabt, da seine beiden Eltern noch lebten, außerdem sei sein Kindsteil von Christian Lennep, Gografen zum Bakenfeld, von Gerichtswegen gepfändet, da er den Berndt Boickman getötet habe. Der Beklagte wird verurteilt, das, was nach Zahlung an das Gogericht übrig bleibt, der Klägerin zu geben. Er legt Berufung ein. Erwähnt werden Johan Wechman, Herman Deiterinck.
Archivale
Information on confiscated assets
Additional information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person or organization that was persecuted under National Socialism. They could file a claim for compensation or restitution as part of the Wiedergutmachung policy. If the application was submitted by another person or organization than the persecutee (for example, their son or daughter), this other person or organization is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecutee is noted, if known. In the sources, the persecutee is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person or organization not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
