In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Schwedisches Regierungsarchiv >> 2 Inneres (Landessachen) >> 2.2 Spezielle Landessachen >> 2.2 4 Das Tribunal zu Wismar
1686-1704
Enthält: - Briefwechsel des Generalgouverneurs Henrik Horn mit dem Vizepräsidenten des Tribunals Joachim Rüdiger (Röttger) von Owstien vom März 1686 in der Sache des Advocatus Fisci gegen den Kammerbuchhalter Paul Bangengren und wegen der Kontributionseinnahme und Bestellung eigener Einnehmer bei den bremischen Marschländern - Gesuch des Oboisten Hans Michel Moritzky an den Generalleutnant Mauritz von Vellingk um Unterstützung in seiner beim Tribunal anhängigen Prozesssache wegen einer Forderung seiner Ehefrau, sowie Empfehlungsschreiben Vellingks an das Tribunal vom 22. September 1702 - Gesuch des Rates zu Wismar vom 26. Mai 1704 um Intercessionales des Generalgouverneurs wegen Rechtshilfe für Alheit Prigge, Tochter des verstorbenen Johann Prigge aus Sandstedt (mit beigefügtem Gesuch der Tochter an die Stadt Wismar)
Verzeichnung
Ergänzungen: freier Text: siehe auch Rep. 28 Nr. 366/367
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.