Urteilsbegründungen der Assessoren am Tribunal
Show full title
0394
LAG, Rep. 29 Wismarer Tribunal
Wismarer Tribunal >> 02. Relationen
01.04.1844-30.06.1844
Kaufmann Wilhelm Sarnow zu Barth als Bevollmächtigter des Grafen von Krassow contra den Müllermeister Fründ in Barth. - Der Wirtschaftsinspector Friedrich Rewold contra die unverehelichte Friederike Dorothea Brettschneider. - Der von Buggenhagen contra Arndt. - Die Alterleute des Stralsunder Drechselamts contra den Kaufmann Schmidt. - Der Gutsbesitzer Plath zu Carbow contra den Kaufmann Moses Salomon zu Tessin. - Der Kaufmann G. Hossfeldt zu Grimmen contra den Tischlermeister Scheu. - Untersuchungssachen gegen den Tagelöhner Friedrich Bodach in Greifswald. - Die Eigentümer Johann Hagemann und Johan Friedrich Riesebeck contra die Riesebechschen Erben. - Der Kaufmann Moses Salomon contra den von Buggenhagen. - Untersuchungssachen gegen Johann Christoph Harder. - Untersuchungssachen gegen die Wirthschaftsführerin Anna Maria Wilhelmine Johanna Starck. - Untersuchungssachen gegen den Knecht Georg Friedrich Carl Flohr. - Untersuchungssachen gegen den Knecht Johann Christoph Schillow. - Untersuchungssachen gegen Johanna Maria Elisabeth Kracht. - Der Bürgermeister Blessingk ad mand. vom 2. Februar 1844. - Untersuchungssachen gegen den Tagelöhner Wilhelm Lieckfeld aus Ranzin. - Untersuchungssachen gegen den Tagelöhner Johann Friedrich Lotzow zu Rankendorf. - Untersuchungssachen gegen den Tagelöhner Christian Preckel und Consorten. - Untersuchungssachen gegen den Weber Johann Wilhelm Sass und dessen Ehefrau.
Akten
Information on confiscated assets
Additional information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person or organization that was persecuted under National Socialism. They could file a claim for compensation or restitution as part of the Wiedergutmachung policy. If the application was submitted by another person or organization than the persecutee (for example, their son or daughter), this other person or organization is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecutee is noted, if known. In the sources, the persecutee is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person or organization not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
29.10.2025, 11:28 AM CET
Attribution - NonCommercial - ShareAlike 4.0 International