In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Enthaeltvermerke: Enthält v.a.: kaiserliche Privilegien für das Stift, (1275, 1298, 1495, 1627); Vogtei der Grafen von der Mark bzw. der Herzöge von Kleve-Mark über das Stift, (1262, 1291, 1293, 1308, 1328, 1334, 1347, 1371, 1392, 1394, 1398, 1449, 1462, 1481, 1495, 1522, 1540, ); Kaiser Maximilian I. befiehlt Bürgermeister und Rat der Stadt Essen wegen Streitigkeiten zwischen der Äbtissin und den Konventualinnen Elisabeth von Bronkhorst und Irmgard von Diepholz die Rechte von Stift und Äbtissin zu schützen, (1495); weitere Briefe des Kaisers in dieser Sache an die Stadt Essen, die Äbtissin Meina von Daun-Oberstein, den Herzog von Jülich und Berg, den Herzog von Kleve, (1495, 1499); Prozeß des Reichsfiskals gegen das Stift Essen, den Herzog von Kleve und die Stadt Essen, (1496-1499); Kaiser Ferdinand II. an den Pfalzgrafen Wolfgang Wilhelm wegen der durch den Kurfürsten von Brandenburg angemaßten Vogteirechte und weitere Beschwerungen des Stifts Essen, (1627); Übernahme der Erbvogtei durch das Kurfürstentum Brandenburg und Gravamina des Stifts gegen den Erbvogt, (1648-1661, 1702, 1729, 1743, 1788); historische Nachrichten zur Geschichte der Vogtei über das Stift Essen, um 1800. Enthält auch: Abschriften von Urkunden Kaiser Rudolfs I., (1275); Albrechts I., (1298); Maximilians II., (1495, 1499); Ferdinands II., (1627)
Sammlungsregistraturbildner
Sachakte
Bronkhorst
Diepholz
Albrechts I.
Daun-Oberstein,
Ferdinands II.
Maximilian I., Kaiser
Maximilians II.
Rudolfs I.,, Kaiser
Essen
Mark
Jülich
Berg,
Kleve,
Brandenburg
Essen
Reichsfiskals
Vogteirechte
Information on confiscated assets
Further information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.