In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Mandatum de arrestatorium Auseinandersetzung um Beleidigung
Abt. IV. Rep. 1. B Prozeßakten des Tribunals 1653-1803
Prozeßakten des Tribunals 1653-1803 >> 06. 1. Kläger F
(1661-1662) 14.04.1662-16.04.1662
Kläger: (2) Peter Falcke, Kapitän der Artillerie zu Wismar
Beklagter: Johann Böckler, Major a.D.
Anwälte, Prokuratoren: Kl.: Dr. Caspar Wilcken (A & P)
Fallbeschreibung: Bekl. hat Kl. auf dem Wismarer Markt als "General Hundsfott" beschimpft, wofür Kl. Genugtuung verlangt. Da Bekl. abreisen will, bittet Kl., ihn solange festzuhalten, bis die Beleidigung gesühnt ist. Am selben Tag fordert das Tribunal Kl. zur Kautionsstellung auf, Kl. erbittet Mandat an Schiffer Heinrich Danckwardt, Bekl. und dessen Güter bei Strafe von 100 Rtlr nicht mitzunehmen und verpflichtet sich, Kaution zu stellen, woraufhin das Tribunal Bekl. auffordert, die Stadt nicht zu verlassen und dem Schiffer verbietet, Bekl. mitzunehmen. Am 16.04.1662 verhandelt das Tribunal den Fall und vergleicht Parteien gütlich.
Instanzenzug: 1. Tribunal 1662
Prozessbeilagen: (7) von Notar Gottfried Reichardt aufgenommene Aussage von Oberstleutnant Jacob Pirvaß und Oberstleutnant Marten Bartels vom 14.04.1662; Kaution des Kl.s vom 14.04.1662; Kaufvertrag zwischen Major Ingolf von Rosenfeld und Kl. über Haus in der Mecklenburger Straße vom 05.04.1661; Zustimmung des Jürgen Barnekow, Oberstleutnant im "Alten Jütländischen Provinzregiment zu Fuß" zum Hausverkauf vom 24.09.1661; Stadtbuchschriften von Judica 1661 und 14.04.1662
Akten
Information on confiscated assets
Additional information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person or organization that was persecuted under National Socialism. They could file a claim for compensation or restitution as part of the Wiedergutmachung policy. If the application was submitted by another person or organization than the persecutee (for example, their son or daughter), this other person or organization is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecutee is noted, if known. In the sources, the persecutee is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person or organization not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
