Klage der Witwe Arnold Beckman, geb. Maria Hageman in Alverskirchen ./. Herman von Schölver und Otto Pechlein in Schöppingen wegen Herausgabe eines der Klägerin angeblich vom Kriegsvolk geraubten Pferdes.
Show full title
B-C Civ, 1065
B-C Civ Causae Civiles (Zivilprozessakten)
Causae Civiles (Zivilprozessakten) >> 1601-1700
1634
Enthält: Als Zeugen werden vernommen: 1. Berndt Umbgrove aus Alverskirchen, 23 J. alt; 2. Johan Leppelkotte daselbst, 24 J. alt; 3. Johan Hase daselbst, 30 J. alt; 4. Schulte Wedemhove daselbst, 40 J. alt; 5. Johan Kuhlman daselbst, 20 J. alt; 6. Philipp Hoffbaur daselbst, 24 J. alt; 7. Jakob Hagemann daselbst, 40 J. alt; 8. Gerd Lohman daselbst, 24 J. alt; 9. Herman Alking, 26 J. alt; 10. Berndt Werneking, 30 J. alt; 11. Johan Engelberting, 30 J. alt; 12. Gerdt Mölleman, 50 J. alt; 13. Lübbert Gilking, 60 J. alt; 14. Egbert Schulte, 30 J. alt; 15. Johan Hüsing, 20 J. alt; 16. Gerd Alking, 50 J. alt; 17. Johan Westhaus, 30 J. alt; 18. Herman Knepper, 60 J. alt; 19. Kötter Johan Saerbeck in Alverskirchen, 33 J. alt; 20. Johan Langenkamp daselbst, 34 J. alt; 21. Johan Richters daselbst, 30 J. alt; 22. Christoff Focke daselbst, 33 J. alt; 23. Johan Schumacher daselbst, 30 J. alt; 24. Bernd Metter, Bierwirt in Alverskirchen, 40 J. alt; 25. folgende Hufschmiede aus Münster: Johan Niehaus auf der Rotenburg, 54 J. alt, Johan Engeling, 44 J. alt, Georg Hagedorn, 40 J. alt, Gerd Wulffers, 28 J. alt. Der Beklagte Otto Pechlein ist 1639 Quartiermeister des Obristleutnants Hilmar Knigge in Backum. Erwähnt werden Herman Borcherinck, Johan Hoting, Herman Hesseling, Evert Schulte Althoff, Herman Schmeddes u. Bürgermeister Johan Klocke in oder bei Schöppingen; Schmied Johan Türner; Johan zum Bertelweck; Lübbert Travelman zu Ebbeling, Gutsherr der Klägerin; Ratsherr Arnold Deiterman; Henrich Frilinghaus; Herman Brinkman; Bäcker Herman Gökeman; Herman Poppenberg; Johan Vincke; Johan Spielbrinck.
Archivale
Information on confiscated assets
Additional information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person or organization that was persecuted under National Socialism. They could file a claim for compensation or restitution as part of the Wiedergutmachung policy. If the application was submitted by another person or organization than the persecutee (for example, their son or daughter), this other person or organization is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecutee is noted, if known. In the sources, the persecutee is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person or organization not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
09.01.2026, 11:34 AM CET